There are many ways that people choose to treat fine lines and wrinkles, and one of them is to use an injectable treatment, such as Botox; however, you may be wondering about the differences in Dysport vs. Botox. This has been a common concern for many people, because Dysport is a relatively new injectable that is quite similar to Botox, but although they are both derived from the botulinum toxin, there are also several differences between the two that you may want to consider before you decide which one to use. As you consider the Botox vs. Dysport dilemma, you may want to compare several different factors, such as cost, reaction time, and what types of wrinkles they treat. This consideration, along with advice from your doctor, can help you make a more informed decision. You may be surprised about the differences between Botox vs. Dysport, even though they are similar in formulation.
Dysport vs. Botox for Crow’s Feet
When it comes to treating crow’s feet, which are the wrinkles that develop at the corners of the eyes from laughing and smiling, both Dysport and Botox are used for treatment. Because Botox is better known as a brand, people tend to choose it more often, but according to a number of physicians, Dysport is just as effective. For the treatment of crow’s feet, Dysport vs. Botox may not last as long, although there are some tests that show that the difference in duration is negligible. However, tests also show that Dysport also tends to disperse over a wider area once it’s injected into the skin, which may be an advantage to treating crow’s feet that have fanned out over the skin.
Dysport vs. Botox for Forehead Wrinkles
Forehead wrinkles can be a challenge to treat, but if you’re considering Dysport vs. Botox, the rate at which Dysport disperses may be one of several advantages. Because these wrinkles may exist from the hairline to the eyebrows, a number of injections of Botox may be necessary to treat them all, and when you are paying per injection, this is something to consider. However, many physicians insist that it makes little difference when it comes to using Dysport vs. Botox for forehead wrinkles because it is the technique used to inject the protein that matters, not the brand of injectable used. Dysport also seems to work more quickly, offering its users results within 48 hours instead of within several days.
Dysport vs. Botox Ingredients
Although Dysport vs. Botox are quite similar when it comes to how they are made, there are one or two differences that may help you decide which product you should choose in order to treat forehead wrinkles and crow’s feet. The primary difference in Dysport vs. Botox is that the protein molecules in Dysport are smaller than those contained in Botox, which means that not only do you see quicker results; the units have smaller and more affordable measurements.
The primary similarity with Dysport vs. Botox is how they work to reduce the appearance of wrinkles. Both injectable proteins work by cutting off nerve communication in the muscles at the site of injection, preventing the muscles there from contracting as they usually do. When these muscles become relaxed, the appearance of wrinkles on the forehead and around the eyes are drastically reduced, and because Botox and Dysport both last for weeks, they both prevent the wrinkles from becoming deeper.
Dysport vs. Botox Side Effects
Because they are both derived from the botulinum toxin the side effects for Dysport vs. Botox are quite similar as well and may include pain and tenderness at the injection site, swelling, and muscle weakness in the surrounding area if the injectable should spread. You should work with your cosmetic surgeon closely before making a decision about whether to use Dysport vs. Botox to treat your facial wrinkles.
Peter is a beauty and health writer living between UK and Australia. Beside writing he worked as a beauty consultant for many fashion events around UK & Australia too.